Deliberación para democracias polarizadas: asambleas ciudadanas e inteligencia artificial

Autores/as

Descargar

Resumen

La deliberación pareciera poder contener los riesgos de espacios públicos degradados que refuerzan y legitiman discursos populistas, xenófobos y autoritarios. Este artículo reflexiona sobre dos alternativas actuales que se consideran apoyos para mejorar la deliberación: por un lado, el modelo de los mini-públicos, también llamados muchas veces “asambleas ciudadanas” con participantes seleccionados por sorteo; y, por otro, los usos de la inteligencia artificial al servicio de la deliberación. En el primer caso, nos preguntamos si el modelo de las asambleas ciudadanas es exportable a contextos latinoamericanos a partir de investigaciones sobre la experiencia de (Re)surgentes en la región; en el segundo caso, nos preguntamos qué puede hacer (y qué no puede) la IA en un proceso deliberativo, a partir de una sesión de experimentación con la Plataforma Pol.is e IA generativas de uso cotidiano.

Palabras clave:

Deliberación , Polarización , Asambleas Ciudadanas , Inteligencia Artificial

Biografía del autor/a

Rocío Annunziata, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas

Doctora en Études Politiques (École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales) y en Ciencias Sociales (Universidad de Buenos Aires). Se desempeña como Investigadora independiente del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas con sede en el Instituto de Investigaciones Políticas de la Universidad Nacional de San Martín y como profesora del Doctorado en Ciencia Política en la misma universidad.

Citas

Almeida, V., Fabrino Mendonça, R. y Filgueiras, F. (2025). Thinking of algorithms as institutions. Communications of the ACM, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3680411

Alnemr, N. (2020). Emancipation cannot be programmed: Blind spots of algorithmic facilitation in online deliberation. Contemporary Politics, 26(5), 531–552.

Arendt, H. (2004). La condición humana. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Bächtiger, A. y Dryzek, J. (2024). Deliberative democracy for diabolical times: Confronting populism, extremism, denial, and authoritarianism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009261845

Bennett, W. L. y Kneuer, M. (2024). Communication and democratic erosion: The rise of illiberal public spheres. European Journal of Communication, 39(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231217378

Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19.

Borge Bravo, R., Balcells, J. y Padró-Solanet, A. (2019). Platform politics in Europe. A model for the analysis of online citizen deliberation: Barcelona case study. International Journal of Communication, 13, 25.

Camarelles Queralt, G. (2023). Asambleas ciudadanas y reformas constitucionales en Islandia e Irlanda: sorteo y deliberación como instrumentos de profundización democrática. Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, (88), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.428891

Cervellini, S., Adams, K., Rodrigues, M. y Sendretti, L. (2024). Citizens’ assemblies in Brazil: An analysis of the role of mini-publics on building democratic participatory climate public policies. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2369907

Chambers, S. (2018). The philosophic origins of deliberative ideals. En A. Bächtiger et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.

Cohen, J. (2007). Deliberación y legitimidad democrática. Cuaderno Gris, (9).

Courant, D. (2020). Des mini-publics délibératifs pour sauver le climat ? Analyses empiriques de l’Assemblée citoyenne irlandaise et de la Convention citoyenne française. Archives de philosophie du droit, 62(1), 485–507.

Curato, N., Farrel, D., Geissel, B. et al. (2021). Deliberative mini-publics: Core design features. Bristol University Press.

Curato, N., Smith, G. y Willis, R. (2024). Deliberative democracy and climate change: Exploring the potential of climate assemblies in the Global South. Strömsborg: International IDEA. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2024.34

Curato, N., Dryzek, J. S., Levai, D., Mellier, C., Ross, M. y Wilson, R. (2025). Where next for global climate deliberation: From proof of concept to a role in transformation. Earth System Governance, 25, 100280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100280

Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing Participatory Evaluation. En New Directions for Evaluation, (80), 5–23. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Della Porta, D. (2017). Democracias. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.

Dryzek, J., Bächtiger, A. et al. (2019). The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation. Science, 363, 1144–1146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2694

Duberry, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence and democracy. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Elster, J. (2001) [1998]. La democracia deliberativa. Barcelona: Gedisa.

European Alternatives. (2025). Democracy is a collective act of care (Issue 10). European Alternatives.

Farrell, D. M., Suiter, J. y Harris, C. (2018). ‘Systematizing’ constitutional deliberation: The 2016–18 citizens’ assembly in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 34(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2018.1534832

Farrell, D. M. (2020). Deliberative mini-publics and referendums: The Irish case. Journal of Representative Democracy, 59(1), 55–73.

Fernández-Martínez, J. L., Font, J. y Wojcieszak, M. (2023). Do citizens’ assemblies influence public policy? Exploring the conditions for policy impact in deliberative mini-publics. Policy Studies, 44(5), 678–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2022.2035045

Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. Yale University Press.

Fishkin, J. S. (2025). Can deliberation cure the ills of democracy? Oxford University Press.

Fishkin, J., Siu, A., Diamond, L. y Bradburn, N. (2021). Is deliberation an antidote to extreme partisan polarization? Reflections on “America in One Room.” American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1464–1481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000642

Frenkiel, É. (2017). Hacker la démocratie taïwanaise: Audrey Tang et la réinvention de la politique. Participations, 17, 121–153.

Frenkiel, É. y Delorme, C. (2025). Boosting, not replacing: Online deliberation tools in a face-to-face student citizens’ assembly. Recherches en Communication, 56. https://doi.org/10.14428/rec.v56i.78543

Gastil, J. y Wright, E. O. (2019). Legislature by lot: Transformative designs for deliberative governance. Londres: Verso Books.

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (1999) [1981]. Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Madrid: Taurus.

Habermas, J. (2005) [1992]. Facticidad y validez: Sobre el derecho y el Estado democrático de derecho en términos de teoría del discurso. Madrid: Trotta.

Himmelroos, S. (2017). Discourse quality in deliberative citizen forums – A comparison of four deliberative mini-publics. Journal of Public Deliberation, 13(1), Artículo 3.

Ingham, S. y Levin, I. (2018). Effects of exposure to deliberative mini-public conclusions on public opinion. American Political Science Review.

Innerarity, D. (2025). Una teoría crítica de la inteligencia artificial. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.

Iturmendi Rubia, J. M. (2023). Algorithmic discrimination and its impact on human dignity and human rights: Special reference to immigrants. Deusto Journal of Human Rights, 12, 257–284. https://doi.org/10.18543/djhr.2910

Jacobs, K. (2024). Have a little faith in deliberation? Trust, populism, and attitudes after participation in mini-publics. Political Studies Journal.

Jungherr, A., & Schroeder, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the public arena. Communication Theory, 33(2–3), 164–?. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad006

Jungherr, A., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Deliberation: The AI Penalty and the Emergence of a New Deliberative Divide, Government Information Quarterly, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102079

Knobloch, K. R., Gastil, J., Reedy, J. y Cramer Walsh, K. (2013). Did they deliberate? Applying an evaluative model of democratic deliberation to the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(2), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.760746

Landemore, H. (2023). Can AI bring deliberative democracy to the masses? En R. Chang y A. Srinivasan (eds.), Conversations in philosophy, law, and politics (pp. 39–69). Oxford University Press.

Levitsky, S. y Ziblatt, D. (2018). Cómo mueren las democracias. Barcelona: Ariel.

Lewis, P. R., Lewis, S., Lewis, S., Gaudet, A. M., & Ottley, A. (2023). Reimagining digital public spaces and artificial intelligence for deep cooperation. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

López Flores, L. M. (2022). Colonialidad algorítmica: Racialización y sexualización mecanizada en el capitalismo digital: Una perspectiva de género. Teknokultura Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 19(2), 231-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/TEKN.78681

Manin, B. (1998). Los principios del gobierno representativo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Manin, B. (2011). Comment promouvoir la délibération démocratique ? Priorité du débat contradictoire sur la discussion. Raisons Politiques, 42(2), 83–113.

McCormick, J. P. (2011). Machiavellian democracy. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Mouffe, C. (2007). En torno a lo político. Buenos Aires: FCE.

OCDE. (2020). Innovative citizen participation and new democratic institutions: Catching the deliberative wave. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en

OCDE. (2023). OECD Deliberative Democracy Database. https://airtable.com/appP4czQlAU1My2M3/shrX048tmQLl8yzdc/tblrttW98WGpdnX3Y/viwX5ZutDDGdDMEep

Pilet, J.-B., Bol, D., Vittori, D. y Paulis, E. (2022). Deliberative mini-publics and democratic legitimacy: Evidence from comparative research. European Political Science Review.

Sandover, R., Moseley, A. y Devine-Wright, P. (2021). Deliberating climate action: Stakeholder views on the UK Climate Assembly. Environmental Politics, 30(6), 1044–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1930196

Setälä, M. y Smith, G. (2018). Mini-publics and deliberative democracy. En A. Bächtiger et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.

Sintomer, Y. (2017). Sorteo y política: ¿De la democracia radical a la democracia deliberativa? Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 72, 25–43.

Smith, G. (2024). We need to talk about climate: How citizens’ assemblies can help us solve the climate crisis. University of Westminster Press.

Spada, P. y Peixoto, T. C. (2025). The limits of representativeness in citizens’ assemblies: A critical analysis of democratic minipublics. Journal of Sortition, 1(1), 137–159.

Steenbergen, M. R., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. y Steiner, J. (2003). Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1, 21–48.

Štětka, V. y Mihelj, S. (2024). The illiberal public sphere: Media in polarized societies. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54489-7

Strandberg, K., Himmelroos, S. y Grönlund, K. (2019). Do discussions in like-minded groups necessarily lead to more extreme opinions? Deliberative democracy and group polarization. International Political Science Review, 40(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117692136

Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring deliberation’s content: A coding scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1), Artículo 12.

Tessler, M. H., Bakker, M. A., Jarrett, D., Sheahan, H., Chadwick, M. J., Koster, R., Evans, G., Campbell-Gillingham, L., Collins, T., Parkes, D. C., Botvinick, M. y Summerfield, C. (2024). AI can help humans find common ground in democratic deliberation. Science, 162, 3859.

Tseng, Y.-S. (2022). Algorithmic empowerment: A comparative ethnography of two open-source algorithmic platforms – Decide Madrid and vTaiwan. Big Data & Society, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221123505

Van Reybrouck, D. (2016). Against elections: The case for democracy. Random House UK.

Vrydagh, J., Bottin, J., Reuchamps, M., Bouhon, F. y Devillers, S. (2021). Les commissions délibératives entre parlementaires et citoyens tirés au sort au sein des assemblées bruxelloises. Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, 2492, 5–68.

Waldner, D. y Lust, E. (2018). Unwelcome change: Coming to terms with democratic backsliding. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628

Yessimova, M. S., & Shevyakova, T. V. (2024). Deep Fakes in the Digital Media Age: Opportunities and Threats. Хабаршы. Журналистика сериясы, 73(3), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.26577/HJ.2024.v73.i3.4

Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.