Consulta sin consenso
Autores/as
-
Matthew Martin
University of Texas at Austin
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3460-3603
Descargar
Resumen
Las crisis constitucionales surgen cada vez más no del fin de las dictaduras, sino de las desilusiones de la democracia, generando demandas de mayor participación ciudadana. A partir de entrevistas con 30 delegados y funcionarios de la Convención Constitucional Chilena, esta nota de investigación examina por qué uno de los experimentos participativos más ambiciosos de la historia falló. El análisis revela tres tensiones interconectadas que caracterizan la consulta sin consenso: secuenciación (cuándo el aporte ciudadano informa la deliberación de las élites), agregación (cómo el aporte se vuelve accionable), y autoridad (qué fuerza vinculante tiene la participación sobre los representantes). La Convención intentó un compromiso ciudadano extensivo sin acuerdo previo de las élites sobre estas cuestiones fundamentales, produciendo mecanismos que lucharon por vincular a los ciudadanos con la toma de decisiones. El caso revela una paradoja: las condiciones que hacen la consulta más necesaria—fragmentación aguda y fracaso representacional—también hacen la implementación coherente más difícil.Citas
Almabrands. (2020). Confianza en la era de la marca pública (ICREO). Almabrands. https://www.almabrands.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Almabrands-ICREO-2020.pdf
Atria, F. (2022). El proceso constituyente y su futuro depués del plebiscito (p. 21). La Casa Común.
Bahamonde, J., Bollen, J., Elejalde, E., Ferres, L., & Poblete, B. (2018). Power structure in Chilean news media. PLOS ONE, 13(6), e0197150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197150
Bain, M., Huh, J., Han, T., & Zisserman, A. (2023). WhisperX: Time-Accurate Speech Transcription of Long-Form Audio (No. arXiv:2303.00747). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.00747
Banks, A. M. (2007). Expanding Participation in Constitution Making: Challenges and Opportunities. William and Mary Law Review, 49, 1043.
Bargsted, M. (2022, September 13). ¿Pesó la desinformación en el Rechazo? Una respuesta estadística. CIPER Chile. https://www.ciperchile.cl/2022/09/13/peso-la-desinformacion-en-el-rechazo-una-respuesta-estadistica/
Brandt, M., Cottrell, J., Ghai, Y., & Regan, A. (2011). Constitution-making and Reform: Options for the Process. Interpeace.
Campos-Parra, H., & Navia, P. (2025). Ideological polarization in roll call votes in constitutional conventions: The case of Chile in 2021–2. Parliamentary Affairs, 78(1), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsae009
Canzano, A., Dammert, L., Dingemans, A., Disi Pavlic, R., Figueroa Rubio, P., Mella Polanco, J. M., Navarrete Yáñez, B., Olavarría Gambi, M., Paulus, N., & Segovia, C. (2024). El proceso constituyente chileno (2019 - 2022): Análisis, interpretaciones y perspectivas (Primera edición: septiembre de 2023). RIL Editores.
Cohen, N., & Arieli, T. (2011). Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311405698
Convención Constitucional de Chile. (2021a, October 7). Reglamento de mecanismos, orgánica y metodologías de participación y educación popular constituyente.
Convención Constitucional de Chile. (2021b, December 1). Reglamento de participación y consulta indígena.
Cooperativa.cl. (2024, July 30). Universidades, fuerzas de seguridad y radios tienen el mayor nivel de confianza. Cooperativa.cl. https://cooperativa.cl/noticias/pais/educacion/universidades/universidades-fuerzas-de-seguridad-y-radios-tienen-el-mayor-nivel-de/2024-07-30/141240.html
Cozza, J. F. (2024). Trust the process: Citizen participation and procedural legitimacy in constitutional change. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2024.2421556
Delamaza, G. (2014). Enhancing Democracy: Public Policies and Citizen Participation in Chile. Berghahn Books.
Delamaza, G. (2024). Por un Chile diferente: Participación popular en el proceso constituyente (2019-2022). LOM Ediciones.
Delucchi, A. S. (2024). The Chilean Constitutional Convention: An Exercise for the Pluriverse. Global Studies Quarterly, 4(3), ksae071. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae071
Dixon, R., & Ginsburg, T. (2017). The forms and limits of constitutions as political insurance. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 15(4), 988–1012. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox080
Dixon, R., & Landau, D. (2021). Abusive constitutional borrowing: Legal globalization and the subversion of liberal democracy (First edition). Oxford University Press.
Ebrahim, H., Fayemi, K., & Loomis, S. (1999). Promoting a Culture of Constitutionalism and Democracy in Commonwealth Africa [Technical report]. Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.
Eisenstadt, T. A., LeVan, A. C., & Maboudi, T. (2015). When Talk Trumps Text: The Democratizing Effects of Deliberation during Constitution-Making, 1974–2011. American Political Science Review, 109(3), 592–612. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000222
Eisenstadt, T. A., LeVan, A. C., & Maboudi, T. (2017). Constituents Before Assembly: Participation, Deliberation, and Representation in the Crafting of New Constitutions (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316717080
Eisenstadt, T. A., & Maboudi, T. (2019). Being There Is Half the Battle: Group Inclusion, Constitution-Writing, and Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 52(13–14), 2135–2170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019830739
Elster, Jon. (2000). Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituent Assemblies. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(2), 345–421.
Escudero, M. C. (2024). Institutional resistance: The case of the Chilean Convention 2021–22. Global Constitutionalism, 13(1), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381723000291
Fábrega, J. (2022, April 22). Sesgos, falsedades y prejuicios ante el trabajo constituyente: Así comentan las redes. CIPER Chile. https://www.ciperchile.cl/2022/04/22/sesgos-falsedades-y-prejuicios-ante-el-trabajo-constituyente/
Figueroa Rubio, P. (2023). The failed case of a perfect design? The Case of Chile’s Constitution Making Process (2016-2022) (No. No. 2023-16; MPIL Research Paper Series). Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law.
Finkel, J. S. (2008). Judicial Reform as Political Insurance: Argentina, Peru, and Mexico in the 1990s. University of Notre Dame Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.21995819
Franck, T. M., & Thiruvengadam, A. K. (2010). Norms of International Law Relating to the Constitution-Making Process. In L. E. Miller (Ed.), Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution-Making (pp. 3–19). United States Institute of Peace.
Fuentes, C. (Ed.). (2023). El proceso fallido: La dinámica constituyente en Chile 2020-2022 (Primera edición). Catalonia.
García, J. F. (2024). A failed but useful constitution-making process: How Bachelet’s process contributed to constitution-making in Chile. Global Constitutionalism, 13(1), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381723000254
García-Huidobro, L. E. (2024). Elite non-cooperation in polarized democracies: Constitution-making deferral, the entry referendum and the seeds of the Chilean failure. Global Constitutionalism, 13(1), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381723000321
Ginsburg, T. (2003). Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge University Press.
Ginsburg, T., & Álvarez, I. (2024). It’s the procedures, stupid: The success and failures of Chile’s Constitutional Convention. Global Constitutionalism, 13(1), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381723000242
Ginsburg, T., Elkins, Z., & Blount, J. (2009). Does the Process of Constitution-Making Matter? Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5(1), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172247
Gronemeyer, M. E., & Porath, W. (2015). Un estudio de la homogeneidad entre las posturas editoriales y de las fuentes informativas en la prensa de referencia chilena. Cuadernos.Info, 36, 139–153. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.36.567
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hagaman, A. K., & Wutich, A. (2017). How Many Interviews Are Enough to Identify Metathemes in Multisited and Cross-cultural Research? Another Perspective on Guest, Bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) Landmark Study. Field Methods, 29(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16640447
Hart, V. (2003). Democratic Constitution Making. In Special Report. United States Institute of Peace.
Hart, V. (2010). Constitution Making and the Right to Take Part in a Public Affair. In L. E. Miller (Ed.), Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution-Making (pp. 20–54). United States Institute of Peace.
Heiss, C. (2021). Latin America Erupts: Re-Founding Chile. Journal of Democracy, 32(3), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0032
Heiss, C. (2023, August 29). The new Chilean constituent process: Exercising the ‘muscle’ of public participation in an adverse context. ConstitutionNet. http://constitutionnet.org/news/new-chilean-constituent-process-public-participation
Heiss, C. (2025a). Iniciativas populares de norma como innovación democrática institucional: Un análisis del proceso constitucional chileno 2021-2023. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, FES Oficina en Chile.
Heiss, C. (2025b, September 8). El espejismo de la participación: Entre expectativas y realidad. El Mostrador. https://www.elmostrador.cl/noticias/opinion/columnas/2025/09/08/el-espejismo-de-la-participacion-entre-expectativas-y-realidad/
Heiss, C., & Suárez-Cao, J. (2024). Constitution-Making in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Chilean Process. PS: Political Science & Politics, 57(2), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909652300104X
Hirschl, R. (2007). Towards Juristocracy: The origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism (First Harvard University Press paperback edition). Harvard University Press.
Hirschl, R., & Hudson, A. (2024). A Fair Process Matters: The Relationship between Public Participation and Constitutional Legitimacy. Law & Social Inquiry, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2023.82
Horowitz, D. L. (2021). Constitutional Processes and Democratic Commitment. Yale University Press.
Houghton, I. (2025, August 11). Could the Public Participation Bill Fix Our Current Tensions? Amnesty Kenya. https://www.amnestykenya.org/could-the-public-participation-bill-fix-our-current-tensions/
Hudson, A. (2021a). Political Parties and Public Participation in Constitution Making: Legitimation, Distraction, or Real Influence? Comparative Politics, 53(3), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041521X15966512980176
Hudson, A. (2021b). The Veil of Participation: Citizens and Political Parties in Constitution-Making Processes (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878685
Issacharoff, S., & Verdugo, S. (2023). Populismo constituyente, democracia y promesas incumplidas: El caso de la Convención Constitucional Chilena (2021-2022)Constituent populism, democracy, and failed promises: The case of the Chilean Constitutional Convention (2021-2022). International Journal of Constitutional Law, 21(5), 1517–1548. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moae003
Larrain, G., Negretto, G., & Voigt, S. (2023). How not to write a constitution: Lessons from Chile. Public Choice, 194(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01046-z
Maboudi, T. (2020). Reconstituting Tunisia: Participation, Deliberation, and the Content of Constitution. Political Research Quarterly, 73(4), 774–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919854802
MacLean, L. M. (2013). The Power of the Interviewer. In L. Mosley (Ed.), Interview Research in Political Science (pp. 67–83). Cornell University Press.
Martin, M. (2025a). Constitutional Cherry-picking: How Drafters Leverage Public Input in Constitution-Making.
Martin, M. (2025b). Elite Fractures, Public Capture: The Strategic Use of Public Consultation in Global Constitution-Making. Journal of Law and Courts, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.9
Martin, M. (2025c). From Data to Demos: Public Consultation and the Logic of Will-Confirmation in Constitution-Making.
Mikecz, R. (2012). Interviewing Elites: Addressing Methodological Issues. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(6), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412442818
Moehler, D. (2006). Participation and support for the constitution in Uganda. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 44(2), 275–308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X06001637
Moehler, D. (2007). Participation in Transition: Mobilizing Ugandans in Constitution Making. Studies in Comparative International Development, 42(1–2), 164–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-007-9005-5
Negretto, G. L. (2018). Democratic constitution-making bodies: The perils of a partisan convention. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(1), 254–279.
Negretto, G. L. (2020). Constitution-making and liberal democracy: The role of citizens and representative elites. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 18(1), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa003
Núñez-Mussa, E. (2021). Chile: Crisis of trust and a precarious industry. Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855428-3
Palanza, V., & Sotomayor Valarezo, P. (2024). Chile’s failed constitutional intent: Polarization, fragmentation, haste and delegitimization. Global Constitutionalism, 13(1), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204538172300028X
Palestini, S., & Medel, R. M. (2025). The ‘Withdrawn Citizen’: Making Sense of the Failed Constitutional Process in Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.70019
Partlett, W. (2012). The Dangers of Popular Constitution-Making. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 38(1), 193–238.
Pogrebinschi, T. (2023). Citizen Participation in Chile’s Constitution-Making Process (Exploring Worldwide Democratic Innovations, p. 14). European Democracy Hub. https://europeandemocracyhub.epd.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Case-Study-Chile-FINAL-v2.pdf
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. (2025, January 17). Encuesta Bicentenario UC: El rol de la universidad en la crisis de confianza. http://www.uc.cl/noticias/encuesta-bicentenario-uc-el-rol-de-la-universidad-en-la-crisis-de-confianza/
Prieto, M., & Verdugo, S. (2021). Understanding Chile’s Constitution-Making Procedure. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(1), 1–5.
Przeworski, A. (2020). Authoritarianism, Authority, and Representation. Asian Survey, 60(2), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2020.60.2.347
Saati, A. (2015). The Participation Myth: Outcomes of Participatory Constitution Building Processes on Democracy. Umeaa{}University.
Saati, A. (2017). Constitution-Building Bodies and the Sequencing of Public Participation A Comparison of Seven Empirical Cases. Journal of Politics and Law, 10(3), 13. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v10n3p13
Saldaña, M., Orchard, X., Rivera, S., & Bustamante-Pavez, G. (2024). “Your house won’t be yours anymore!” Effects of Misinformation, News Use, and Media Trust on Chile’s Constitutional Referendum. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19401612241298853. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241298853
Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes (1st edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854907
Secretaría Ejecutiva de Participación Ciudadana. (2023). Participación Ciudadana en el Proceso Constitucional 2023 [Informe final]. Universidad de Chile; Pontificia Universidad Católica.
Selwyn, N. (2013). Researching the once-powerful in education: The value of retrospective elite interviewing in education policy research. Journal of Education Policy, 28(3), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.728630
Siavelis, P. M. (2016). Crisis of Representation in Chile? The Institutional Connection. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 8(3), 61–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1600800303
Soto Barrientos, F., Suárez, O., & Alemparte, B. (2025). The Citizen Initiative in Chile’s constitution-making (2021–2023): Lessons from a participatory and digital mechanism in comparative perspective. Global Constitutionalism, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381725100038
Srivastava, A. (2025, September 10). Rewrite Constitution, probe loot of 3 decades: Demand of Nepal Gen Z protesters. India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/rewrite-or-amend-constitution-investigate-properties-looted-in-3-decades-demands-of-nepal-gen-z-protesters-2784849-2025-09-10
Suarez-Cao, J. (2021). Reconstructing Legitimacy After Crisis: The Chilean Path to a New Constitution. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 13(2–3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-021-00160-8
Svensson, M. (2022, September 6). Cómo la política identitaria corrompió el proceso constituyente. IES Chile. https://www.ieschile.cl/columna/cmo-la-poltica-identitaria-corrompi-el-proceso-constituyente-17525
Tansey, O. (2007). Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(4), 765–772. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096507071211
The Business Standard. (2025, September 14). NCP calls for Constituent Assembly elections to implement July Charter. The Business Standard. https://www.tbsnews.net/bangladesh/politics/ncp-calls-constituent-assembly-elections-implement-july-charter-1236401
Toro Maureira, S., & Noguera, A. (2024). Chile: La deriva del sistema político y el fracaso del nuevo proceso constitucional. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago), ahead. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2024005000110
Vargas-Murillo, A. R. (2025). From design to practice in deliberative constitutionalism: Lessons and challenges from the Chilean constitutional process (2021–2022). Frontiers in Political Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1581326
Verdugo, S., & García-Huidobro, L. E. (2024). How do constitution-making processes fail? The case of Chile’s Constitutional Convention (2021–22). Global Constitutionalism, 13(1), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204538172300031X
Wike, R., Fetterolf, J., Schulman, J., & Hernandez Ramones, S. (2025, September 15). People Around the World Want Political Change, but Many Doubt It Can Happen. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/09/15/people-around-the-world-want-political-change-but-many-doubt-it-can-happen/
Twitter