The influence of compulsory voting on non-institutional participation in Latin America

Authors

Download

Abstract

This research analyzes the influence of compulsory voting system (C.V) on non-institutional participation in Latin America through a multilevel analysis of the Latino Barometer Survey (2020). The results indicate that non-institutional participation decreases in countries with sanctioned C.V compared to countries with voluntary voting and those with non-sanctioned C.V for all types of participation. Furthermore, the higher the cost of the action, the less participation there is. On the other hand, in countries with unsanctioned C.V there are mixed results: although participation in demonstrations and protests is lower than in voluntary countries, in the case of signing petitions and other less frequent forms of participation, participation is higher than in countries with voluntary voting.

Keywords:

Non-institutional participation , mandatory voting , sanctioned vote , unsanctioned vote , Latin America

Author Biography

Mencía Gómez Luna, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

Es científica social de datos e investigadora social, graduada en Ciencias Políticas y Sociología y especializada en Ciencias Sociales Computacionales. Ha trabajado en el ámbito de investigación en las Ciencias Sociales en el Instituto de Políticas Públicas del CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas) y en el CIS (Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas).

References

Arbache, G. (2014). Determinantes de la participación no convencional en Brasil. Política e Sociedade, 13 (28), 269-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2014v13n28p269

Becker, G.S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. The University of Chicago Press.

V.O en América y Europa. Nómina de países, causales de exención, y niveles de participación. (2019). Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile. https://obtienearchivo.bcn.cl/obtienearchivo?id=repositorio/10221/26872/1/Voto_obligatorio.pdf

Blais, A. (2006). What affects voter turnout? Annual Review of Political Science, 9 (1), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105121

Blais, A. y A. Dobrzynska. (1998). Turnout in Electoral Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 33 (2), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00382

Carter, N. (2006). Political Participation and the Workplace: The Spillover Thesis Revisited. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 8 (3), 410-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00218.x

Contreras-Ibáñez, C. C., Correa Romero, F. E., y L. García y Barragán, Luis Felipe. (2005). Participación política no convencional: culturas de protesta vs. culturas institucionales. Polis: Investigación y Análisis Sociopolítico y Psicosocial, 1(1), 181-210. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=72610107

Dalton, R., Van Sickle, A. y S. Weldon. (2010). The Individual-Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 40 (1), 51-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000712340999038X

Democracy Index. Age of Conflict. (2023). Economist Intelligence Unit. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2023/

Flórez Ruiz, J. F. (2019). Los Factores Determinantes del Voto: Por qué el V.O No es la Solución al Abstencionismo. Revista Republicana, 27, 189-210. https://doi.org/10.21017/rev.repub.2019.v27.a73

Gordon, S. B., y G. M. Segura. (1997). Cross-National Variation in the Political Sophistication of Individuals: Capability or Choice?. The Journal of Politics, 59 (1), 126-147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998218

Greenberg, E. S., Grunberg, L. y K. Daniel. (1996). Industrial Work and Political Participation: Beyond "Simple Spillover". Political Research Quarterly, 49 (2), 305-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299604900204

IPU Parline. Global data on national parliaments. (2020). Parline. The IPU’s Open Data Platform. https://data.ipu.org/compare?field=country%3A%3Afield_structure_of_parliament#pie

Jackman, R. W. (1987). Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies. American Political Science Review, 81 (2): 405-423. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961959

Jackman, S. (2001). Compulsory Voting. En N. J. Smelser y B. Baltes (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Science (pp. 16314-18), https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1ytype=pdfydoi=d2620b56d54086f3b6123b2c211b4ee00daf7291

Jakee, K. y Sun, G.Z. (2006). Is compulsory voting more democratic?. Public Choice, 129: 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-9008-6

LatinoBarómetro. (2020). Opinión Pública Latinoamericana. Latinobarómetro. https://www.latinobarometro.org/lat.jsp

Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma Presidential Address. American Political Science Association, 9 (1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952255

Lundell, K. (2012). Civic Participation and Political Trust: The Impact of Compulsory Voting. Journal of Representative Democracy, 48 (2), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.683488

Moises, J. A. (1993). Elections, Political Parties and Political Culture in Brazil: Changes and Continuities. Journal of Latin American Studies, 25 (3): 575-611. http://www.jstor.org/stable/158268

Murillo, M. V. (2021). Protestas, descontento y democracia en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad, 293: 4-13. https://biblat.unam.mx/es/revista/nueva-sociedad/articulo/protestas-descontento-y-democracia-en-america-latina

Olson, M. (1965). La lógica de la acción colectiva: bienes públicos y la teoría de grupos. Noriega

Ortiz-Inostroza, C. y E. Lopez. (2017). Explorando modelos estadísticos para explicar la participación en protestas en Chile. Revista de Sociología, 32 (1), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-529x.2017.47883

Panagopoulos, C. (2008) The Calculus of Voting in Compulsory Voting Systems. Political Behavior, 30 (4): 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9058-9

Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press

Pereyra, S. y M. Armesto. (2021). Análisis multicausal de los determinantes individuales de la participación en manifestaciones en Argentina. Desarrollo Económico y Social, 61(233), 30-54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48628443?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents

Powell, G. B. (1986). American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review, 80 (1): 17.43. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/american-voter-turnout-in-comparative-perspective/5A8E10796141C4C4AF5B204984E5322E

Quintelier, E., Hooghe, M., y S. Marien. (2011). The Effect of Compulsory Voting on Turnout Stratification Patterns: A Cross-national Analysis. International Political Science Review, 32 (4), 396-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110382016

Sheppard, J. (2015). Compulsory voting and political knowledge: Testing a ‘compelled engagement’ hypothesis. Electoral Studies, 40, 300-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.10.005

Silva, E.C. (2011). Determinantes Institucionales y Culturales de la Participación Electoral en América Latina: Análisis Comparativo entre V.O y Voluntario. Universidad de Chile. https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/102487

Singh, S. P. (2011). How Compelling is Compulsory Voting? A Multilevel Analysis of Turnout. Political Behaviour, 33, 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9107-z

Singh, S. P. (2018). Compulsory Voting and Dissatisfaction with Democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 48 (3), 843-854. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000041

Samuano Ventura, M. F. (2005). Más allá del voto: modos de participación política no electoral en México. Foro Internacional, 45 (1), 65-88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27738690

Verba, S., Schlozaman, K. L. y H. E. Brady. (1995). Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation, American Political Science Review, 89 (2), 271-294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082425